Skip to content

Anti-Greed Safeguards β€” Lantern ​

Effective Date: 2026-01-09
Status: Constitutional Document (requires 75% employee vote to amend)

Purpose ​

This document establishes structural safeguards to prevent greed-driven decisions from compromising Lantern's mission. These safeguards protect against:

  • External greed: Investors or lenders pressuring for profit maximization
  • Internal greed: Employees prioritizing personal gain over mission
  • Systemic greed: Market forces that incentivize exploitation or mission drift

Core Principle: Mission Over Profit ​

Lantern's mission: Help people be present by creating boundaries between digital life and physical spaces, while protecting user privacy and autonomy.

Greed-driven decisions violate this mission when they:

  • Prioritize revenue growth over user privacy
  • Exploit users (e.g., dark patterns, data selling, surveillance capitalism)
  • Cut corners on security or safety to reduce costs
  • Sacrifice employee well-being for profit margins
  • Abandon independent venues to chase higher-revenue partners

These safeguards prevent greed from winning.


Financial Safeguards (Preventing Profit Maximization at All Costs) ​

1. Profit Distribution Equality (No Executive Bonuses) ​

  • Rule: All distributable profits are shared equally among all employee-owners
  • Formula: (Net profit after tax and reserves) Γ· (number of employee-owners)
  • No exceptions: CEO receives the same profit share as newest employee
  • Reasoning: Eliminates incentive for executives to maximize profits at the expense of employees or users
  • Amendment: Requires 75% vote

2. Salary Cap (3Γ— Maximum) ​

  • Rule: Highest-paid employee cannot earn more than 3Γ— the lowest-paid employee in base salary
  • Current range: 75,000 (minimum) to 225,000 (maximum)
  • Inflation adjustments: Minimum adjusted annually; ratio stays locked
  • Reasoning: Prevents executive enrichment while employees struggle; aligns incentives
  • Amendment: Requires 75% vote

3. Debt Cap (2Γ— Annual Revenue) ​

  • Rule: Total outstanding debt cannot exceed 2Γ— annual revenue
  • Example: If annual revenue is 500,000, max debt is 1,000,000
  • Reasoning: Prevents taking on unsustainable debt that forces cost-cutting, layoffs, or profit-maximizing pivots
  • Override: Requires 75% employee vote for emergencies
  • Enforcement: Quarterly financial reviews; automatic rejection of loan applications exceeding cap

4. Reserve Requirement (6 Months Runway Minimum) ​

  • Rule: Company must maintain 6 months of operating expenses in cash reserves before profit distribution
  • Example: If monthly expenses are 50,000, reserves must be 300,000 before profits distributed
  • Reasoning: Ensures financial stability; prevents short-term greed from jeopardizing long-term survival
  • Distribution priority:
    1. Operating expenses
    2. Debt repayment
    3. Reserve fund (to 6 months runway)
    4. Profit distribution to employees
  • Amendment: Requires 75% vote

5. No Predatory Lending (15% APR Maximum) ​

  • Rule: Company will not accept loans with interest rates exceeding 15% APR
  • Preferred range: 5–10% APR
  • Reasoning: High-interest debt forces profit-maximizing behavior; predatory lenders gain control through debt pressure
  • Red flags: Loan terms with penalty clauses, personal guarantees, or equity conversion triggers
  • Override: Requires 75% vote + Stewardship Board approval

6. No Profit from User Data ​

  • Rule: Lantern will NEVER sell, rent, or monetize user data
  • Scope: Includes location data, personal profiles, behavior analytics, or any PII
  • Reasoning: Protects privacy-first mission; prevents surveillance capitalism business model
  • Revenue sources allowed:
    • Merchant fees (flat campaigns, PPC, subscriptions)
    • Premium user features (optional, privacy-preserving)
    • B2B SaaS tools for merchants
  • Revenue sources prohibited:
    • Selling user data to third parties
    • Targeted advertising based on user tracking
    • Data brokers or analytics resale
  • Amendment: Requires 75% vote + Stewardship Board veto (mission violation)

Operational Safeguards (Preventing Exploitation) ​

7. No Layoffs Without Employee Vote ​

  • Rule: Layoffs require 75% employee vote and can only occur if:
    • Company has < 6 months runway with no path to profitability
    • All other cost-cutting measures have been exhausted (see below)
  • Required steps before layoffs:
    1. Profit sharing reduced to 0%
    2. Salaries reduced proportionally (executives first)
    3. Hiring freeze implemented
    4. Non-essential expenses eliminated (travel, events, perks)
    5. Debt repayment renegotiated if possible
  • Reasoning: Protects employees from being treated as "disposable resources"; ensures shared sacrifice
  • Override: None; this is a constitutional right

8. No Unpaid Overtime or Crunch ​

  • Rule: Employees cannot be required to work more than 32 hours/week (4-day week) without:
    • Explicit consent (opt-in, not opt-out)
    • Overtime pay at 1.5Γ— hourly rate for hours 33–40
    • Double pay for hours >40
  • Crunch culture prohibited: No pressure to work evenings, weekends, or holidays except true emergencies
  • Emergency definition: Security breach, legal deadline, critical system failure (not product launch deadlines)
  • Reasoning: Prevents burnout; protects work-life boundaries; eliminates toxic hustle culture
  • Enforcement: Anonymous reporting; violations investigated by employee committee

9. Transparent Pricing (No Deceptive Practices) ​

  • Rule: All merchant and user pricing must be transparent, clear, and fair
  • Prohibited practices:
    • Hidden fees or surprise charges
    • Deceptive free trials that auto-renew without clear consent
    • Bait-and-switch pricing (advertise low price, charge higher price)
    • Bundling required purchases to inflate costs
  • Required practices:
    • Pricing clearly displayed before commitment
    • Cancellation available at any time (no lock-in contracts)
    • Refund policy clearly stated
  • Reasoning: Aligns incentives; builds trust; prevents short-term revenue grabs that damage long-term relationships
  • Enforcement: Any employee or user can report violations; reviewed quarterly

10. Ethical Partnerships Only ​

  • Rule: Lantern will not partner with organizations that:
    • Exploit workers (e.g., union-busting, wage theft, unsafe conditions)
    • Violate user privacy (e.g., data brokers, surveillance companies)
    • Engage in predatory practices (e.g., payday lenders, multi-level marketing)
    • Contradict Lantern's values (e.g., fossil fuel companies if we adopt climate commitments)
  • Due diligence required: Background check on potential partners; employee vote for major partnerships
  • Reasoning: Prevents mission drift by association; protects brand integrity
  • Amendment: List of prohibited partners updated annually via employee vote

11. Contractor Ratio Limits (Preventing Governance Bypass) ​

  • Rule: Contractors cannot exceed 30% of total workforce (employees + contractors)
  • Calculation: Contractors Γ· (Employees + Contractors) ≀ 0.30
  • Example: If 10 employees, max ~4 contractors (30% ratio); cannot have 10 employees + 6+ contractors
  • Reasoning: Prevents abuse of power by hiring contractors to bypass employee governance mechanisms
    • Contractors have no voting rights
    • Excessive contractor use could dilute employee decision-making power
    • Ensures majority of workforce (70%+) are employee-owners with governance rights
  • Employee approval required: ANY contractor hiring requires:
    • Contracts <$5,000 or <1 month: Delegated authority (CEO/role) with transparency (logged and reported monthly)
    • Contracts $5,000-$25,000 or 1-3 months: Majority employee vote
    • Contracts >$25,000 or >3 months: 75% employee supermajority vote
  • Quarterly review: Finance/operations reviews contractor ratio every quarter
  • Enforcement: If ratio exceeds 30%, company must either:
    1. Convert contractors to employees (preferred)
    2. Reduce contractor headcount immediately
    3. Hire more employees to restore ratio within 60 days
  • Zero tolerance: No temporary exceptionsβ€”30% is absolute maximum
  • Stewardship Board oversight: Any pattern of approaching 30% triggers Stewardship Board review for potential abuse

Anti-Abuse Safeguards:

  • Transparency: All contractor engagements logged publicly to all employees within 48 hours
  • No shell games: Cannot split work among multiple contractors to avoid approval thresholds
  • Related parties with disclosure: Contractors CAN be family/friends if properly disclosed and approved per Hiring Policy (requires disclosure, recusal, 75% vote, no entities controlled by employees without transparency)
  • Independent review: Any employee can challenge contractor hire within 14 days; triggers review vote
  • Whistleblower protection: Employees who report contractor abuse are protected from retaliation

Governance Safeguards (Preventing Power Grabs) ​

12. No Equity for Non-Employees ​

  • Rule: Equity (voting shares) can ONLY be held by current employee-owners
  • Exceptions: Requires 75% employee vote + Stewardship Board approval
  • Reasoning: Prevents investors from gaining control; ensures employees always have final say
  • Related: See Shareholder-Lender Framework for lender structure

13. Stewardship Board Veto (Mission Protection) ​

  • Rule: Independent Stewardship Board can veto decisions that violate the mission
  • Veto scope:
    • Selling user data
    • Accepting equity investment that dilutes employee control
    • Mergers that end employee ownership
    • Governance changes that weaken mission protections
  • Override: Employees can override veto with 80% supermajority
  • Reasoning: Protects mission from being undermined, even by employees under financial pressure
  • Board composition: 3–7 independent trustees (not lenders, not employees, no conflicts)

14. No Personal Guarantees on Debt ​

  • Rule: Employees will NEVER provide personal guarantees for company debt
  • Reasoning: Prevents lenders from using personal financial pressure to force business decisions
  • Corporate liability only: All loans are company obligations, not individual obligations
  • Enforcement: Any loan agreement with personal guarantees is automatically void

15. Transparent Financial Reporting ​

  • Rule: All employee-owners have full access to financial records
  • Reports required:
    • Monthly P&L (profit and loss statement)
    • Quarterly balance sheet
    • Annual revenue, expenses, and profit distribution summary
  • Public reporting: Annual summary financials (revenue, expenses, employee count) published publicly
  • Reasoning: Transparency prevents hidden deals, conflicts of interest, and greed-driven decisions
  • Privacy protection: Individual compensation anonymized in public reports

16. Rotating Leadership & Term Limits ​

  • Rule: C-level roles (CEO, CTO, COO, etc.) have 4-year term limits
  • Rotation: After 4 years, role must be opened for internal candidates or re-election vote
  • Reasoning: Prevents power concentration; ensures fresh perspectives; reduces risk of greed-driven leadership entrenchment
  • Extension: Requires 75% employee vote to extend term or re-elect same person
  • Exceptions: Early-stage (first 2 years) or if no suitable internal candidates available (requires majority vote to extend search)

Mission Safeguards (Preventing Drift from Core Values) ​

17. Annual Mission Review ​

  • Rule: Employees vote annually to confirm or update the company mission
  • Process:
    1. Mission statement reviewed in employee meeting
    2. Open discussion: Are we living the mission? Any needed changes?
    3. Vote to reaffirm or amend mission (75% required for amendments)
  • Reasoning: Keeps mission front-and-center; allows evolution without drift

18. Values Scorecard (Quarterly) ​

  • Rule: Every quarter, employees rate the company on core values:
    • Presence over profiles: Are we helping users be present?
    • Privacy first: Are we protecting user data?
    • Clarity over constant connection: Are we reducing digital noise?
    • Real places create boundaries: Are we supporting physical spaces?
  • Scoring: 1–5 scale; anonymous responses aggregated
  • Outcome: If any value scores ❀️.0 average, employees discuss remediation plan
  • Reasoning: Early warning system for mission drift

19. User Harm Prevention ​

  • Rule: Any feature or policy change that could harm users requires user impact review before implementation
  • Harm definition:
    • Privacy violation (e.g., tracking without consent)
    • Safety risk (e.g., exposing location to stalkers)
    • Psychological harm (e.g., addictive dark patterns, FOMO manipulation)
    • Financial exploitation (e.g., hidden fees, predatory upsells)
  • Review process:
    1. Proposed change documented with user impact assessment
    2. Employee committee reviews for potential harm
    3. If harm detected, change rejected or mitigated
    4. Final implementation requires majority employee vote
  • Reasoning: Prevents "move fast and break things" culture from harming users

20. No Exit Pressure ​

  • Rule: Lantern will not accept investment or loan terms that pressure an exit (acquisition or IPO)
  • Prohibited terms:
    • Mandatory liquidity events (e.g., must IPO within 5 years)
    • Forced buyout clauses
    • Drag-along rights (investors force sale)
    • Ratchet clauses (punish company for not exiting)
  • Reasoning: Prevents investors from forcing a sale that ends employee ownership or compromises mission
  • Enforcement: All loan/investment terms reviewed by employee committee + legal counsel before acceptance

21. Community Accountability ​

  • Rule: Lantern commits to publishing an annual transparency report to users and community
  • Includes:
    • Privacy practices (data collected, retention, third-party sharing)
    • Security incidents and responses
    • Governance changes (ownership, leadership, major decisions)
    • Financial health (revenue, employee count, sustainability)
    • Mission alignment (values scorecard results, user harm reports)
  • Reasoning: Public accountability prevents backroom deals; builds user trust; creates external pressure to stay aligned

Enforcement Mechanisms ​

Internal Enforcement ​

  • Rotating employee committee investigates potential violations
  • Anonymous reporting available for employees and users
  • Whistleblower protection: Employees who report violations cannot be retaliated against
  • Remediation: Violations corrected; repeat offenders terminated via employee vote

External Enforcement ​

  • Stewardship Board reviews major governance decisions for mission violations
  • Legal review: All contracts and agreements reviewed by counsel to ensure compliance
  • Public accountability: Annual transparency report creates external oversight

Consequences for Violations ​

  • Minor violations: Remediation plan + public acknowledgment
  • Major violations: Reversal of decision + employee vote on corrective action
  • Intentional violations: Immediate termination (for employees) or relationship termination (for partners/lenders)

Red Flags (Warning Signs of Greed) ​

Watch for these warning signs and escalate to employee vote:

🚩 Leadership wants to:

  • Accept equity investment without clear mission protections
  • Reduce transparency or limit employee access to financials
  • Avoid employee votes on major decisions
  • Implement aggressive growth targets at expense of sustainability

🚩 External pressure to:

  • Sell user data or implement tracking/ads
  • Cut costs via layoffs before exhausting other options
  • Accept predatory loan terms
  • Partner with companies that conflict with values

🚩 Internal culture shifts to:

  • "Growth at all costs" mentality
  • Celebrating overwork or crunch culture
  • Executive compensation growing faster than employee compensation
  • Reduced transparency or secretive decision-making

Response: Any employee can call an emergency governance meeting to address red flags.


Case Studies: What Greed Looks Like (and How to Prevent It) ​

Example 1: Investor Pressure for User Data Monetization ​

Scenario: Company accepts VC funding; investors pressure to "unlock revenue potential" by selling anonymized user data.

Greed driver: Investors want ROI; selling data is lucrative.

Safeguard that prevents it:

  • Safeguard #6: No profit from user data (requires 75% vote + Stewardship veto)
  • Safeguard #11: No equity for non-employees (investors have no votes)
  • Outcome: Investors have no power to force this; employees reject proposal.

Example 2: Executive Self-Enrichment ​

Scenario: CEO wants to increase own salary to 500,000 while lowest employee earns 75,000.

Greed driver: CEO believes they "deserve" more for leading the company.

Safeguard that prevents it:

  • Safeguard #2: Salary cap (3Γ— maximum = 225,000)
  • Outcome: CEO cannot raise salary above cap without 75% employee vote to change ratio.

Example 3: Layoffs to Boost Profit Margins ​

Scenario: Company has 8 months runway but wants to cut staff to increase profit distribution.

Greed driver: Remaining employees want higher profit shares.

Safeguard that prevents it:

  • Safeguard #7: No layoffs without <6 months runway + 75% vote
  • Outcome: Layoffs prohibited; profit distribution happens as planned with all employees included.

Example 4: Forced Acquisition Offer ​

Scenario: Large company offers 10M to acquire Lantern; some employees want payout.

Greed driver: Personal financial gain from acquisition.

Safeguard that prevents it:

  • Safeguard #12: Stewardship Board veto (acquisition ends employee ownership)
  • Constitutional decision: Requires 75% employee vote
  • Outcome: Acquisition rejected unless 75% agree AND Stewardship Board approves (unlikely if mission compromised).

Example 5: Dark Pattern Features for Engagement ​

Scenario: Product team wants to add "streaks" that pressure users to check in daily (FOMO manipulation).

Greed driver: Higher engagement = better metrics for fundraising or acquisition.

Safeguard that prevents it:

  • Safeguard #18: User harm prevention (psychological harm review required)
  • Outcome: Feature rejected or redesigned to be opt-in and non-punitive.

Greed vs. Sustainability (Comparison) ​

Greed-Driven DecisionSustainable Alternative
Sell user data for revenueCharge merchants fairly for value delivered
Maximize profit at any costMaintain 6-month reserves + fair profit sharing
Layoffs to boost marginsShared sacrifice (reduce profit share, freeze hiring)
Accept predatory VC fundingBootstrap or use revenue-based financing
Exploit workers (long hours, low pay)4-day weeks, 3Γ— salary cap, unlimited PTO
Dark patterns for engagementPrivacy-first, user-respecting features
Partner with unethical companiesPartner only with values-aligned organizations
Exit via acquisition to enrich foundersMaintain employee ownership indefinitely

Amendment Process ​

These safeguards are constitutional:

  • Require 75% employee-owner vote to amend
  • Annual review during employee governance meeting
  • Proposed amendments require 30-day review period
  • Anonymous voting required

Weakening safeguards (e.g., reducing debt cap, removing profit distribution equality) also requires Stewardship Board approval to prevent greed-driven self-sabotage.



Final Commitment ​

Lantern commits to mission over profit, people over greed, sustainability over exploitation.

These safeguards are not aspirationalβ€”they are enforceable protections embedded in governance documents. If you see greed creeping in, you have the tools to stop it.

When in doubt, ask:

  • Does this decision prioritize short-term profit over long-term mission?
  • Does this decision exploit users, employees, or partners?
  • Would we be proud to explain this decision publicly?

If the answer to any of these is "no," the decision violates our values. Speak up. Vote against it. Protect the mission.

Built with VitePress